Civil Procedure II Outline – Wendy Parker, Spring 2016
Answer
Rule 8
Amendments
Rule 15
Pleading Sanctions
Rule 11
Counterclaims and Crossclaims
Rule 13
Third Party Practice
Rule 14
Joinder of Claims
Rule 18
Rule 19
Rule 20
Intervention
Rule 24
Class Actions
Rule 23
Hansberry v. Lee
Supplemental Jurisdiction
28 U.S.C. § 1367
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services
Discovery
Rule 26
Work Product
Hickman v. Taylor
Expert Work Product
Devices
Rule 33
Rule 34
Rule 36
E-Discovery & Depositions
Rule 30
Rule 37
Sanctions
Pre-Trial Adjudication
Dismissal
Rule 41
Summary Judgment
Rule 56
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett
Trial
Jury Selections
7th Amendment
Dairy Queen, Inc. v. Wood
Trial Motions
Rule 50
Rule 59
Appeal
28 U.S.C. § 1291
Claim Preclusion
Issue Preclusion
Procedural Due Process
Settlement
Essay Checklists/Decision Flowcharts/Summaries
Class Action
Summary Judgment
Supplemental Jurisdiction
Joinder/Intervention
Amendments
Sanctions
Timeline of Depositions
FRCP/Statutes Cheat Sheet
(b) Defenses; Admissions and Denials.
(1) In General. In responding to a pleading, a party must:
(A) state in short and plain terms its defenses to each claim asserted against it; and
(B) admit or deny the allegations asserted against it by an opposing party.
(2) Denials—Responding to the Substance. A denial must fairly respond to the substance of the allegation.
(3) General and Specific Denials. A party that intends in good faith to deny all the allegations of a pleading—including the jurisdictional grounds—may do so by a general denial. A party that does not intend to deny all the allegations must either specifically deny designated allegations or generally deny all except those specifically admitted.
(4) Denying Part of an Allegation. A party that intends in good faith to deny only part of an allegation must admit the part that is true and deny the rest.
(5) Lacking Knowledge or Information. A party that lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of an allegation must so state, and the statement has the effect of a denial.
(6) Effect of Failing to Deny. An allegation—other than one relating to the amount of damages—is admitted if a responsive pleading is required and the allegation is not denied. If a responsive pleading is not required, an allegation is considered denied or avoided.
(c) Affirmative Defenses.
(1) In General. In responding to a pleading, a party must affirmatively state any avoidance or affirmative defense, including:
• accord and satisfaction;
• arbitration and award;
• assumption of risk;
• contributory negligence;
• duress;
• estoppel;
• failure of consideration;
• fraud;
• illegality;
• injury by fellow servant;
• laches;
• license;
• payment;
• release;
• res judicata;
• statute of frauds;
• statute of limitations; and
• waiver.
(2) Mistaken Designation. If a party mistakenly designates a defense as a counterclaim, or a counterclaim as a defense, the court must, if justice requires, treat the pleading as though it were correctly designated, and may impose terms for do
ence
New legal theory is okay; need general facts in the original complaint
(C) the amendment changes the party or the naming of the party against whom a claim is asserted, if Rule 15(c)(1)(B) is satisfied and if, within the period provided by Rule 4(m) for serving the summons and complaint, the party to be brought in by amendment:
(i) received such notice of the action that it will not be prejudiced in defending on the merits; and
(ii) knew or should have known that the action would have been brought against it, but for a mistake concerning the proper party’s identity.
Use to add new claim against new party after statute of limitations has run
Notice within statute of limitations plus 4 month period (90 days)
Sufficiency of notice
Mistake requirement – focus on defendant’s knowledge
Amending as a matter of course or by court’s permission
Factors the judge has to consider
Stage of litigation
Reasons for amendment
Viability of the amended claim or defense
Reason for not including the new allegations in the original pleading
Amendments are liberally granted unless the party asking for the amendment
Creates undue delay
Shows bad faith
Shows repeated failure to cure deficiencies in the complaint
Creates undue prejudice to the party opposing the amendment
Futility of amendment
Merits prejudice versus preparation prejudice