Select Page

Constitutional Law I
Valparaiso University School of Law
Levinson, Rosalie Berger

SCHOOL: Valparaiso University
CLASS: Indiana Constitutional Law
PROFESSOR: Professor Levinson
TEXT: Selected Readings From Professoe
 
 
I.          State Constitutions in the Federal System………………………………………            2
II.            Construing the Constitution……………………………………………………..      2
III.            Individual Rights……………………………………………………………….            3
            A.            Equality, Natural Rights, and Right to Reform Government: Art 1, § 1..            3
            B.            Religious Freedoms: Art. 1, §§ 8-9…………………………………….            3
            C.            Freedom of Speech and Press: Art. 1, §9……………………………….       4
            D.            Courts, Due Course of Law, Equal Privileges: Art. 1, §§ 12-13………..            4
            E.            Jury Trial in Civil Cases: Art. 1, § 20……………………………………            5
            F.            Rights of Accused in Criminal Cases: ……………………………………    5
                        1.            Search and Seizure: Art. 1, § 11………………………………….   6
                        2.            Right to Counsel/Self-Incrimination: Art. 1, §§ 13-14…………            6
                        3.            Double Jeopardy/Self-Incrimination: Art. 1, § 14……………….       7
                        4.            Cruel, Unusual, Proportional Penalty: Art. 1, §§ 16 & 18……….            7
                        5.            Jury to Determine the Facts: Art. 1, § 19………………………..            7
            G.            Other Personal Rights and Protections……………………………………        8
                        1.            Takings & Involuntary Servitude: Art. 1, §§ 21, 37……………..          8
                        2.            Debtors’ Privileges, Exemption Laws: Art. 1, § 22………………        8
                        3.            Impairment of Contract: Art. 1, 24………………………………        8
                        4.            Right to Bear Arms: Art. 1, § 32………………………………..      8
IV.            Distribution/Separation of Powers: Art. 3………………………………………            9
            A.            Legislative: Art. 4……………………………………………………….            9
            B.            Executive and Administrative: Art. 5, 6…………………………………    9
            C.            Judicial: Art. 7…………………………………………………………..            10
            D.            Education, State Institutions: Art. 8, § 1; Art. 9, §§ 1, 2……………….       10
            E.            Finance: Art. 10, 13……………………………………………………            10
V.            Reflections of State Constitutional Jurisprudence………………………………..          11
 
I.          State Constitutions in the Federal System
            A.            Cornerstones of Supreme Court
                        1.            prohibition on advisory opinions AND
                        2.            independence of State Courts
a.            if state court decision rests primarily on federal law, Supreme Court may advise
b.            if state court decision rests primarily on bona fide state issues, Supreme Court will not review
3.            Bona Fide State Issue def.: absent plain statement that state court decision rested on adequate and independent state grounds, Supreme Court has jurisdiction
 
            B.            Differences between U.S. Const AND Ind. Const.
                        1.            10 provisions in U.S. Bill of Rights—Ind. has 37
2.            U.S. Const. focuses on what government cannot do AND Ind. Const. as some provisions on what government should do
 
ANALYSIS of Standing under Ind. Const.
1.         U.S. Const. uses case and controversy OR double nexus test for E/C violation
2.         Ind. Const.
a.            case and controversy like U.S. Const. AND
b.            public standing doctrin

se of necessary protection and prevention
c.            Court will indulge all reasonable presumptions in favor of the State
 
            ANAYSIS—Art 1, § 1 (natural rights)
            1.            Statutes are presumed VALID
            2.            Art.1, § 1 (natural rights) can only be restricted by police power
            3.            Art.1, § 1 protects
                        a.            liberty AND
                        b.            property
            4.            Statute must be substantially related to police power
            COMPARISON TO U.S.—similar to penumbra theory, but actually in the text?
 
            B.            Religious Freedoms: Art. 1, §§ 8-9
1.            A right is impermissibly alienated when state materially burdens one of the core values the right embodies
2.            Violation of Religious Freedoms
 
Material Burden def.: if right as impaired, would no longer serves purpose for which it was designed
 
ANALYSIS—Art. 1, § 4 (freedom of religion)
1.            Ind. Const. protects CORE VALUES
2.            If CORE VALUE, State cannot materially burden
            a.         right to free exercise OR
            b.         right to be free from government preference for particular religion
DIFFERENCE FROM U.S.—no S/S or R/B analysis AND don’t look to government interests
 
ANALYSIS—Art. 1, § 6 (public money for benefit of religion)
1.         NO substantial benefit can be conferred on religious functions