Pleading
Complaint – FRCP 4/8(a)
· FRCP 4 – Technical rules
(a)(1)A summons must contain:
(A) name the court and the parties;
(B) be directed to the defendant;
(C) state the name and address of the plaintiff’s attorney or — if unrepresented — of the plaintiff;
(D) state the time within which the defendant must appear and defend;
(E) notify the defendant that a failure to appear and defend will result in a default judgment against the defendant for the relief demanded in the complaint
(F) be signed by the clerk; and
(G) bear the court’s seal.
(c) Service
(2-3) By 18+ y/o non-party; Or Marshall; Or Special Appointee
· FRCP 8(a) – General Rules
A pleading that states a claim for relief must contain:
1. a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court’s jurisdiction, unless the court already has jurisdiction and the claim needs no new jurisdictional support;
2. a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief; and
3. a demand for the relief sought, which may include relief in the alternative or different types of relief.
Two types of pleading
· Notice Pleading (FED standard)
o Originally: facts not very important as will come out in discovery
o Later: Bell Atlantic v Twombly
§ SC required more facts to keep from incentivizing frivolous claims involving huge discovery
· In whichD would just settle
§ Created plausible standard
· Fact/Code Pleading (CA standard)
o Profess to require a factual statement in the complaint
o Some statutory allegations okay so long as D is fairly apprised of the factual basis against him
§ Semol v Sansoucie
· P took the statutory text and turned it into a complaint
Who has the Burden of Pleading
· P has the duty of asserting the claims
· D has the duty of asserting defenses and immunities
· Gomez v Toledo
o P accused D of violating civil rights statute
§ Statute included immunity of “good faith”
o Court: D has the duty of asserting all defenses/immunities
§ Making claims easy, in the interest of protecting fed rights
Special Matters that Alter Pleading Standards – FRCP 9
· Statute or rule can create a heightened pleading standard in specific cases
o FRCP 9(b) – Alleging Fraud or Mistake
§ Party must state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud and mistake. Malice, intent, knowledge etc may be alleged generally
o Leatherman v Tarrant County Narcs
§ 5th Circuit dismisses case based on circuit rulings imposing a heightened pleading standards
§ SC overruled: Heightened standard counter to FRCP 8
· FRCP can specifically create a higher standard
o i.e. FRCP 9
· Courts can not unilaterally create heightened standard
Inconsistent Alternative Allegations
· P allowed to make allegations inconsistent w/ one another
· Both are presented to Jury but P cannot collect on both
· P does not need to guess what theory is more likely to win
· Pleading to one is not an admission the other is false
· McCormick v Kopmann
o P husband dies in accident
o
D should be aware of these defenses immediately
· Bringing these motions early serves judicial economy
· Keeps D from saving them in case things go badly on merits
Motion for a More Definite Statement – 12(e)
· Response to a statement which is so vague or ambiguous that moving party can not prepare a response
· Must be made before responsive pleading
· Must point out defects complained of and details desired
· Pleading or any issue appropriate may be struck if no response in 10 days (or time court sets)
Answer – FRCP 8
(b)
· (1) – Responding party must:
o (A) State in short plain terms its defenses to each claim asserted against it; AND
o (B) Admit or deny the allegations asserted against it by an opposing party
· (2) – Substance of denials
o A party must fairly respond to the substance of the allegation
· (3) – General v Specific Denials
o Denying all allegations can be done by a general denial
o If only specific allegations are denied those not denied are considered admitted
· Zielinski v Philly Piers
o P injured in forklift crash
o Filed complaint against D
§ D was not proper party to sue
o D filed general denial (denying all accusations)