Select Page

Wills and Trusts
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Gillett, Mark R.

WILLS & TRUSTS
OUTLINE

Professor Gillett

Chapter 1 – Introduction To Estate Planning

I. DEFINITIONS:

(1) Decedent: Person who dies.
(2) Testate: with a will.
(3) Testator: one dying with a will.
(4) Intestate: without a will.
(5) Executor: Person designated to execute the will.
(6) Administrator: person in charge of gathering and distributing assets when one dies intestate.
(7) Devise: passing or giving real property.
(8) Devisee: person to whom real property is given.
(9) Bequest: passing or giving personal property.
(10) Legatee: person to whom personal property is given.
(11) Succession: the actual taking or receiving of the real or personal property.
(12) Heirs: People entitled to take property if decedent dies intestate.
(13) Beneficiary: person designated to receive life insurance benefits or benefit from trust.
(14) Descendant: anyone in the family line.

II. LIMITATIONS ON POWER TO TRANSMIT PROPERTY

(1) Constitutional Protection: the 5th Amendment prevents the taking of property without just compensation. Therefore, the State cannot abolish both (a) the passing of property by will and (b) the passing of property through intestacy. The State can abolish one or the other but not both. If both are abolished, the State has committed a “taking” in violation of the 5th amendment. [Hodel v. Irving]

3 Factors Courts use to Determine if “taking” has occurred:
(1) Economic Impact of Governmental Regulation;
(2) Interference with reasonable Investment Backed Expectations; and
(3) Character of Governmental Action.

Protections run to Decedent: The Constitutional protections run to the decedent – not the beneficiary. Thus, the decedent has the right to pass the property to whomever he wishes if done by will. Children do not have a constitutional right to inherit property and can be disinherited if the testator wishes.

Not “State Action”: A will does not have to pass Constitutional standards because there is no “state action.” The court merely effectuates the testator’s intent.

Can be Conditioned on Religion: a person has the right to condition his will on religion. Constitutional protections on freedom of religion do not apply.

(2) Statutory Forced Share: The testator can disinherit anyone except for a surviving spouse. The surviving spouse is entitled to a percentage of the estate via statute (statutory share).

(3) Rule against Perpetuities: Trusts and clauses of will devising property are subject to the rule of perpetuities.

(4) Estate and Gift Tax: the estate can be taxed.

a. Federal Estate Tax: the estate has a federal tax exemption of $1.5 million. A decedent may transfer assets to his or her heirs up to $1.5 million tax free. After $1.5 million, the estate is taxed at 50%.

b. Federal Gift Tax: Any individual can make an inter vivos gift up to $11,000 per donee, per year, without paying federal gift tax.

c. Oklahoma State Estate Tax: A decedent may transfer $100 without incurring state estate taxes.

Property given to Spouse not Taxed: the property given to a spouse is not subject to tax regardless of the amount.

(5) Uncertainty: conditions of a will can be void due to uncertainty if it is impossible for the court to determine whether the condition has been satisfied. For example, if the will conditions the grant on the devisee or legatee being a “good Christian,” the condition is void due to uncertainty because the court cannot tell what a “good Christian” is.

(6) Public Policy Restrictions: clauses of a will are unenforceable if they violate the following public policies:

a. Divorce: any provision that promotes or requires divorce is invalid.

b. Family Disharmony: any provision that encourages family disharmony is invalid.

Example: “I give $100,000 to my son but if my son and his wife continue to smoke tobacco, then to the University of Oklahoma.” This provision is enforceable as to the son but not the son’s wife because it would lead to family disharmony if the son was to quit smoking and the wife did not, causing the son to lose the inheritance.

c. Unreasonable Restraints on Marriage: restrictions based on marriage are perfectly legal unless they are unreasonable. They do not violate the fundamental right to marry guaranteed by the Constitution because the Constitution only prevents state action. [Shapira v. Union Nat’l Bank]

“Unreasonable” Restraint: The restraint is unreasonable if the marriage permitted by the will is unlikely to occur. [Rest. (Second) of Property, Donative Transfers § 6.2] The decision depends upon the court and the specific facts of the case. Thus, if the case is in New York where the court is liberal, being gay may render the condition void as marriage is unlikely to occur.

Examples: If the grant says “To Daniel unless he marries Colleen” the restraint would be unreasonable if Daniel was already engaged, or married, to Colleen since another permitted marriage is not likely to occur. Other examples include, clauses that would require that the heir marry at an early age, i.e. before the child reaches the age of consent, etc., and/or clauses that require marriage to a person of a specific religious faith when there are not a lot of people of that faith in the area, etc.

d. Racial Restrictions: racial restrictions of any kind may or may not be permitted depending upon the community and the restriction.

e. Destruction of Property: will provisions cannot encourage or mandate the destruction of pets, houses, or personal property.

f. Destruction of unfinished works: generally, a provision requiring the destruction of an artist’s unfinished work will be enforced unless the court determines that the public’s interest in the work outweighs the artists interest in having them destroyed

Contingent Beneficiary – “Gift Over” Provisions: The testator can include a provision providing that the gift shall go to another person in the event that the court declares that the provision violates public policy and the provision will be enforced by the court. Thus, if the court declares the provision void for violating public policy, it will enforce the gift-over provision.

Invalid Provision and no Contingent Beneficiary: If the will contains an invalid clause and does not provide for a contingent beneficiary in a “gift over” provision, courts have two options:

(1) Give property to original beneficiary: some states will give the property to the original beneficiary free of the restraint; or

(2) Allow property to pass intestate: other states void the gift altogether and allow the property to pass according to the state’s intestacy statutes.

III. PROBATE

“Probate”: probate is the judicial process by which the decedent’s estate is administered. The court ensures that the decedent’s debts are paid and transfers title to the decedent’s property to the beneficiary of the will, if the decedent had a will, or the decedent’s heirs pursuant to the state’s intestacy statutes.

Two (2) Types of Probate:

(1) Primary or Domiciliary Probate: The decedent’s estate is probated in the jurisdiction where the decedent was domiciled at the time of death. The court has jurisdiction over (a) all of the decedent’s personal property and (b) the decedent’s real property located within the state.

(2) Ancillary Probate: If the decedent owns real property in a state other than the one in which he was domiciled at the time of death, a second probate, known as an ancillary probate, is required in the additional state or states where the real property is located. Since the original court only has jurisdiction over the decedent’s real property located within that state, a subsequent probate must be filed within the other states in order transfer title of the real property to the decedent’s beneficiaries or heirs.

Non-Probate Property: the following classifications of property pass outside of probate:

(1) Joint Tenancy Property: all property held in joint tenancy (e.g. real estate, bank accounts, etc.) pass outside of probate. The decedent’s interest vanishes at death. Once death occurs, the remaining joint tenant files a death certificate and title to the property is then transferred to the remaining joint tenant only.

(2) Life Insurance: Life insurance proceeds are paid to the named beneficiary upon death. The life insurance is a contractual matter and, thus, probate is unnecessary. Upon presentation of a death certificate, the proceeds are paid directly to the named beneficiary.

(3) Contracts containing “Payable-on-Death” Provisions: If the decedent has a contract with a bank, employer, or other person or company to distribute certain property (usually a pension plan, IRA, or other type of “investment” plan) to a named beneficiary upon the decedent’s death, the property passes outside probate as a matter of contract law. Upon presentation of a death certificate, the property is paid directly to the named beneficiary.

(4) Interests in a Trust: When a decedent transfers property to a trust, the trustee holds the property for the benefit of t

Fraud;
(3) Improper execution or attestation of will by the decedent or subscribing witnesses; or
(4) Any other questions that substantially affect the validity of the will. [58 O.S. § 41]

Procedure for Contesting a Will after Admitted to Probate: Once a will has been admitted for probate, any interested person can still contest the will so long as he or she does so within three (3) months from the date the will was admitted to probate. The contestant must file a petition alleging that evidence of the following grounds has been discovered since the will was admitted for probate:
(1) a will of a later date has been discovered that effectively revokes or changes the will previously admitted;
(2) Lack of jurisdiction for probate;
(3) Incompetency, Duress, Menace, Fraud, or Undue Influence when admitted will was made; or
(4) Improper execution or attestation of will by the decedent or subscribing witnesses. [58 O.S. § 61]

Review Problems: Be sure and look over problems 1 – 4 beginning on page 46 of textbook when reviewing for exam.

Will Construction – Four Corners Rule: when determining the testator’s intent, the court and the interested parties are limited to using only evidence contained within the will (i.e. within the four corners of the document).

Exception: If a particular provision or provisions of the will are ambiguous (i.e. capable of more than one interpretation), then the parties are permitted to use extrinsic evidence to determine the actual intent of the testator.

IV. PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY

Attorney’s Duty to Beneficiaries: when drafting a will, trust, etc., the attorney owes a duty to all intended beneficiaries as well as the client. The duty owed to the beneficiaries is based on the foreseeability of harm that may potentially result if a mistake is made whereas the duty to the client is based upon privity of contract. [Simpson v. Calivas]

Liability: Some courts limit the attorney’s potential liability is limited by the face of the will. However, most courts hold that the attorney is liable for any and all harm caused by the negligent failure to effectuate the testator’s intent.

Standard applied to Determine Breach of Duty: the attorney is expected to “possess knowledge of those plain and elementary principles of law which are commonly known by well informed attorneys, and to discover those additional rules of law which, although not commonly known, may readily be found by standard research techniques.” [Smith v. Lewis] The attorney also has a duty to refer the client to a specialist when the attorney cannot handle the matter with reasonable skill and care and, if he fails to do so, he will be held to the standard of skill ordinarily possessed by a specialist. [Horne v. Peckham]

Attorney’s Fiduciary Duty to Clients: the attorney also owes a fiduciary duty to all of his clients. Thus, the attorney is prevented from intentionally misleading the client or failing to protect the client’s interests during the representation of another client. If the attorney breaches this fiduciary duty, he or she can be liable for all harm resulting to the client.

Example: Attorney (“A”) continuously represents both Father (“F”) and Daughter (“D”) for various legal needs. F owns two car dealerships, one of which is managed by D and the other is managed by a Son (“S”). F wants to leave both of the dealerships to S when he dies but he doesn’t want D to know. Thus, F has A draft two different wills: the first will gives one dealership to S and one to D and the second will gave both dealerships to S. F executed the first will that morning and the second will that afternoon, thereby making the second will the