Select Page

Civil Procedure I
University of Nebraska School of Law
Lenich, John P.

SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
I          Nebraska State Court
1         24-302
A        District Courts have and exercise general, original, and appellate jurisdiction in all matters, both civil and criminal, except where otherwise provided
2         24-517
A        County Courts à 51,000 or less
3         Small Claims Courts have jurisdiction of civil matters where the amount in controversy is under 2,700 (adjusted every 5 years by Supreme Court
II       Diversity Jurisdiction (1332: diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs)
1         (a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions where the amount in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and is between—
A        (1) citizens of different States
B        (2) citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state;
C       (3) citizens of different States and in which citizens or subjects of a foreign state are additional parties; and
D       (4) a foreign state, defined in section 1603(a) of this title, as plaintiff and citizens of a State or of different States
Þ    citizens or subjects of a foreign states [alien v. alien] v The constitution does not allow for this, but Congress has allowed it
E        FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, AN ALIEN ADMITTED TO THE UNITED STATES FOR PERMANENT RESIDENCE SHALL BE DEEMED A CITIZEN OF THE STATE IN WHICH SUCH ALIEN IS DOMICILED
Þ    Only applies to:
v 1332
v 1335
v 1441
2         Key Points:
A        Complete Diversity: All of the plaintiffs must be citizens of different states than all of the defendants
B        Diversity is determined at the time of filing
C       Citizenship for diversity purposes is determined by an individuals domicile
Þ    Definition: Domicile is residence coupled with the intent to make the residence one’s home (i.e. remain there indefinitely)
v Intent by itself does not determine domicile (some action is required)
·         Examples of Action:
1.       Drivers License
2.       Current Residence
3.       Voter Registration
4.       Past Voting Record
5.       Location of Bank Accounts and Property
6.       Memberships
7.       Auto Registration
3         (c) The domicile of descendant matters for citizenship purposes
4         Corporations1332(c)(1)
A        A corporation is a citizen of ANY state by which it has (1) been incorporated AND of the state where it has its (2) principle place of business
Þ    The Process for Principle Place of Business: (ONLY ONE PPB IS DETERMINED)
v Place of Operations Test: This is where the substantial predominance of activities occurs
·         If there is not a substantial predominance, then the nerve center test is used
1.       Nerve Center Test: Corporate Headquarters / Administrative Test
5         Partnerships
A        Citizenship for partnerships is determined by the citizenship of EACH partner (different from corporations)
6         Amount in Controversy
A        Standard
Þ    The claim submitted by the plaintiff must be in good faith
Þ    If the plaintiff’s amount claimed is apparently incorrect and unjustifiable, then the complaint can be dismissed
Þ    The party invoking diversity jurisdiction has the burden of proof
Þ    The plaintiff must set forth facts to show that s/he would be entitled to damages over $75K
v The plaintiff is given the benefit of the doubt, unless it can be shown to a legal certainty that the plaintiff cannot recover at least the jurisdictional minimum
·         Policy: There is a liberal standard, because the courts want to avoid turning the case into a trail on the merits of the amount in controversy
B        1332(b): if a plaintiff is awarded less than the jurisdictional minimum, then the plaintiff may have to pay costs
7         Aggregation
A        Definition: When there are multiple claims, the plaintiff can aggregate the value of their claims to reach the amount in controversy requirement
Þ    Aggregation is not a possibility when there are multiple plaintiffs and/or defendants
III     Federal Question Jurisdiction (1331)
1         The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States
A        A case arises under federal law for purposes of 1331 when:
Þ    Federal law creates the cause of action OR
Þ    The resolution of a State cause of action depends on the resolution of a substantial and disputed issue of federal law
v State law claim using federal law to prove one or more of the elements
v The mere presence of a federal issue in a State-created cause of action is not sufficient
·         Question: Does the interest of the federal government warrant the case being heard in federal court?
B        How to determine federal question jurisdiction:
Þ    Look at the well-pleaded complaint
v The federal issue must appear on the face of the plaintiff’s well-pleaded complaint
v Anticipating a defense based on federal law is not sufficient to create federal question jurisdiction
CONCURRENT V. EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION
I          Definition: State courts have concurrent jurisdiction in most cases. Federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction in a limited number of cases, such as federal criminal, antitrust, bankruptcy, patent and copyright, admiralty cases, and suits against the U.S. government
1         Concurrent: Just because a plaintiff has a federal claim, does not mean that the plaintiff has to file in federal court. Cases based upon federally created rights can be heard in state court OR in federal court
A        Congress can rebut concurrent jurisdiction when:
Þ    (1) there is a specific statutory directive [most likely] v “the federal district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action arising under any act of Congress.”
Þ    (2) there is unmistakable implication from legislative history
v Did Congress even consider where the case should be heard when enacting the legislation?
Þ    (3) there is a clear incompatibility between federal interests and state court jurisdiction—no known cases have turned on this point
SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION
I          Supplemental Jurisdiction: 1367(a) & (b): If federal court has original jurisdiction over a claim, then it can assert jurisdiction over all the claims that arise out of the same operative facts
1         (a): In any civil action where the federal district court has original jurisdiction (federal question or diversity) over one claim in a multi-claim case, then the court can assert supplemental jurisdiction over any claims that arise out of the same transaction as that original claim
A        (a): Includes claims that involve the joinder or intervention of additional parties
2         (b): In any civil action of which the district courts have original jurisdiction founded solely on diversity of citizenship, the district courts SHALL NOT have supplemental jurisdiction o

mons
Þ    A case may not be removed on the basis of diversity of citizenship more than 1 year after commencement of the action
D       All of the defendants must consent to the removal
Þ    30 day period starts from which the first defendant is served by the plaintiff
v A minority of courts have rejected the 30 days starting from when the first plaintiff is served
REMAND
I          Remand 1446
1         A civil action can be remanded back to State court when
A        (1) the plaintiff successfully files a motion to remand because of a defect in the removal process or there is no subject matter jurisdiction
B        (2) the federal court recognizes no subject matter jurisdiction
C       (3) the civil action is solely based upon diversity, and the plaintiff has a good faith basis for adding another defendant that would defeat complete diversity
PERSONAL JURISDICTION
I          State Personal Jurisdiction
1         Overview
A        Personal jurisdiction is the power to enter orders and judgments against the defendant that can be enforced
B        The Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment allows a state court to exercise personal jurisdiction over a foreign defendant as long as that defendant has certain minimum contacts with the forum state so that maintenance of the suit does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice
C       Three types of jurisdiction
Þ    In personam—exercising power over the person of the defendant
Þ    In rem—exercising power over real property to determine the status or ownership of the property
Þ    Quasi in Rem—exercising power over the defendant’s property even thought the property is not the subject of the dispute
2         Individual Personal Jurisdiction
A        Specific Personal Jurisdiction: The defendant must have (1) minimum contacts with the forum state and (2) the claim must arise out of those contacts
Þ    The defendant’s in-state contacts must represent (1) a purposeful availment of the privilege of conducting activities in the forum state, thereby invoking the benefits and protections of that state’s laws
Þ    The defendant’s conduct and connection with the forum state are such that s/he should reasonably anticipate being haled into court there
v Cannot be haled into the jurisdiction as a result of random, fortuitous, or attenuated contacts
v The unilateral activity of those who claim some relationship with a nonresident defendant cannot satisfy the requirement of contact with the forum state
B        General Personal Jurisdiction: Courts can assert jurisdiction over ANY claims against the defendant, regardless of his or her contacts with the forum state (does not need to be related to the cause of action)
Þ    (1) When the defendant is served in the forum state