Select Page

International Business Transactions
University of Kansas School of Law
Head, John W.

International Commerce and Investment
Professor Head
Fall 2008

CHAPTER 1 –

Carrie Coulson Example –

General Principals that should be applied:

Pay attention to local legal circumstances
Anticipate problems
Transfer risk to 3Ps –

OPIC Insurance

Rely on trustworthy parties
Draft written agreements more comprehensively
Be alert to the larger legal, political, and cultural context

Three Types of International Business Transactions –

Exports – sale of goods across borders

How to Find and Attract Buyers –

Direct Unaided Exports
Sales Representative/Agency Agreement – rep merely acts as representative of exporting company
Distributor Agreement – exporter makes sales to distributor. Distributor then makes sales in the overseas market.

Licensing of Production

Generally –

Produce goods in the overseas market through an agreement with a the overseas manufacturer
Production Takes place in overseas country
Either Entity controls the means of production

Dangers –

Theft of intellectual property

Direct Foreign Investment –

Generally –

Often last stage of “going international”
Create a subsidiary under the law of the overseas corporation.
Production occurs overseas
Distinct from portfolio investment which involves financial securities or instruments but no physical presence

Special Challenges of Conducting Transborder Business –

Exporting
Licensing of Production
Foreign Direct Investment

The Larger Landscape: Where Global Business Law Fits into the International Legal System –

Course focuses on private international law – transactional law
Private International Law –

In US, refers to private sector economic/business law
Outside US, term refers to conflicts of law

Sources of International Law –

General Sources (Under ICJ Statute)

International conventions/treaties

Most treaties only relate to exports
Few treaties on FDI
On international front – treaty supercedes a countries international law
Only binding on countries that sign the treaties
Force w/in country depends on national law – US = later in time

International custom

Emerges from consistent state practice – a consistent behavior in a particular area over time; uniformity of the practice among states that engage in it.
Once a custom is proven, the custom is binding on all states regardless of whether the state engaged in the custom.
Elements –

Practice of states showing consistency, generality, and duration
Reflecting a sense of legal obligation on the part of those states engaging in the practice.

General Principals of Law Recognized by Civilized Nations
Decisions and teachings of highly qualified publicists

Other Issues in International Law – pp 26

Future of the Nation-State –

Most rules affecting ITC emerge from national legal systems
Many recent treaties, however, cut the other way.
NGOs, Multinational Corporations
Regional trade organizations – ASEAN, MERCOSOR, NAFTA, etc
Trade Groups – G7, G8

A Withering of Multilateralism –

WWI & WWII evoked the rise of multilateral institutions – UN, IMF, WB

North-South Divide –

Originated from the Brandt Commission: Developed Northern countries v. Developing Southern Countries

Terrorism –

What effect will terrorism and related precautionary measures have on ITC?

CHAPTER 2 –

Definitions

Legal tradition – a set of deeply held, historically conditioned attitudes to how law is formulated, taught, and interpreted
Legal Family – a group of nation-states that share a legal tradition
Legal System – the body of rules, both primary and secondary in character, that define and govern legal relations within a particular political entity.

LEGAL TRADITIONS –

Civil –

Civil code is preeminent; constitution less so. Judges accorded lower social status—viewed as mere bureaucrats.
Originated from Roman Law – second oldest legal tradition – 450 BC

Recorded by Justinian 533 CE; rediscovered in 11th century
Westphalia – 1648 – end of 30-years war and rise of modern nation-state
Before nation state, civil law allowed a body of universal law—jus gentium—to develop.
1804 – Code Napoleon
1896 – German Civil Code

The most widely distributed legal tradition
Sources of law: Statutes and Codes; Regulations; Constitution; Case Law; Custom

Common –
Islamic –
Chinese –

Cross-Cultural Negotiations –

Principals –

Will encounter linguistic difficulties: miscommunications, interpreters
Rules for using interpreters:

Hire your own
Explain the deal to the terp b/f hand
Avoid terps that try to control the negotiation
Keep it short
Plan each statement carefully
Give the terp breaks
Treat w/ respect and

Ways Culture Affects Negotiations –

Negotiating Goal: Contract or Relationship

How fluid are the K terms, are they to be renegotiated

Negotiating Attitude: Win/Lose or Win/Win
Personal Style: Informal or Formal

Pay attention to culture’s emphasis on formalism

Communication: Direct or Indirect

To whom do you communicate. Who calls the show

Sensitivity to Time: High or Low
Emotionalism: High or Low
Form of Agreement: General or Specific?
Building an Agreement: Bottom Up or Top Down
Team Organization: One leader or Group Consensus
Risk Taking: High or Low

Ideology and Deal Making –

Ideology has an adversarial quality
Ideological differences can complicate communication
Ideology may lead to hard and fast positions

Dealing with Ideology –

Know your own ideology
\Don’t be preachy
Take the other side’s ideology seriously
Look for ideological divisions on the other side
Avoid discussion of ideological positions and focus on interests
Look for gaps between ideology and reality
Maintain confidentiality

GETTING LOCAL

Procuring Local Legal Counsel – pp 91

Freight Forwarders and Other Facilitators – pp93

International Agents and Distributors – pp95

Agent – Serves a matchmaking function that finds buyers for the seller’s goods.
Distributor – buys directl

reaty – agreement among states that is binding under the principals of international law on the states
Substantive Commercial Code – governs private sector commercial transactions

Unique Aspect: Treaty is directed at the conduct of individual contractors, not States.
CISG as Odd-ball –

CISG as treaty and focused on the actions of private individuals
Binding on states as treaty & focused on private sector
Compare:

GATT – it is a binding treaty but focused on nations
INCOTERMS – focused on private sector but not a treaty and therefore not binding
UCP – Also focused on private sector but not a treaty and not binding.

Does the CISG apply?

Applies:

To goods, but “goods” is left undefined.
Seems intended to govern only sale of moveable tangibles
May be NA to documents/intellectual property

NA to:

Goods for family/personal use unless seller neither knew nor should have. See Art. 2.
Auctions; stocks/securities; ships; electricity
Buyer supplies a substantial part of the materials necessary for the manufacture of the goods. See Art. 3(1).

· Similar to specially-manufactured goods exception.

K for (largely, predominant part) services. See Art. 3(2).

IE – BOT contract – build operate and transfer – predominant part is service

Determine property interest in goods
Determine the validity of the contract à mistake, fraud, or duress. See Art. 4(a).
Liability of seller for death or personal injury. See Art. 5.

Art. 6: Opt-Out provision

Parties may opt-out of the entire CISG or specific provisions
Should make intent clear
To opt out in the US, not enough to say that the law of the US applies à this will lead to application of the CISG as a treaty under the Supremacy Clause.
Parties should state that “the provisions of the UCC as adopted in the State of [] and no the convention for the International Sale of Goods.
**There is no reference to an OPT-IN provision, although freedom of K suggests that such a provision would be effective.

Conflict of Law Rules –

General CoL Rules –

Convention applies to parties w/ PoB in different contracting states (1)(1)(a), or
When conflict of law rules lead to application of the law of a contracting state.(1)(1)(b)
*Nationality of parties is irrelevant. 1(2)

§ *Fact that PoB is in a different state is irrelevant if not disclosed by dealings. 1(3)