Select Page

Government Contract Law
University of Illinois School of Law
Vacketta, Carl L.

Class Notes

Tuesday, January 07, 2014

9:26 AM

Tuesday, 7 Jan 2014

litigation areas

· bid protest:

o 2 proper forums:

· K’ing agency

· 90% of protests occur: GAO

§ research occurs

· misc forum: US Court of Fed Claims

o appellate forum: USDCs → SCOTUS

· claims: problem with money due or expected from the gov’t; breach of K

o forums:

· admin board (4 of them)

· US Court of Fed Claims

§ no GAO involvement

o appellate forum: USDCs → SCOTUS

gov’t K lawyer

· counseling side:

o help companies understanding gov’t K’ing

· enter the field

· bid, protest, claims, due diligence (review documents/Ks held by another comp. set for merger), fraud waste & abuse, etc.

· implement caveats of procurement/K requirements

§ socioeconomic goals of gov’t Ks

· ascertain legal risks: showstoppers, etc.

differences b/t commercial & gov’t K worlds

in the commercial K world

in the gov’t K world

buyers & sellers pretty much equal

gov’t establishes all the rules & controls the process

fair dealing

public awards

fed K $: 60% goes to services; 70% goes to construction

K’ing tool box

· procurement: US gov’t purchases for its direct benefit

o goods, services, R&D, etc.

o most controlled & regulated

o K’or = receiving party

· grant:

o recipient

Thursday, 9 Jan 2013

Financial Controls + Socio-Economic

· TINA

· FAR Part 31 cost factors

· CAS

Chptr 2: The Setting

Friday, January 03, 2014

12:35 PM

2:1

· (8) gov’t procurement = acquisitions

o awarded, administered, & enforced not by a single gov’t dep’t but a variety of military & civilian agencies

o multitude of rules & regs

o gov’t branches (legislative, executive, & judicial) has a role to play

· sometimes w/ divergent objectives & results

Legislative Branch

Friday, January 03, 2014

3:14 PM

2:3 Legislative Branch

· fed “purse strings”

· Congress’s Government Accountability Office (GAO)

2:4 Legislative Branch – Congress

· ultimate source of funds for fed gov’t Ks

o no money can be paid out of the US Treasury unless funds appropriated by an act of Congress

· fed agencies may obligate funds only after authorized & appropriated, pursuant to the express limitations that may be set in the applicable appropriation act

· process:

o reps of gov’t agencies/dep’ts request funds to carry on their functions and hearings held (negotiations, concessions, etc.)

o approved budget referred to the House & Senate Appropriation Committees as a proposed authorization bill

· opportunity to review the legislation & determine whether it will be matched by an appropriation

· can allot any sum for an authorized project, provided it does not exceed the authorized ceiling

o final bill merely specifies a ceiling on spending, not necessarily provides the funds requested

· sent to President

· Anti-Deficiency Act (ADA)

o an officer/e’ee of the US gov’t may not:

· make/authorize an expenditure/obligation exceeding an amount available in an appropriation/fund for the expenditure/obligation; or

· involve the gov’t in a K/obligation for the payment of money before an appropriation is made unless authorized by law

o judicial awards do not violation the ADA no matter when ruled

· enacts the laws that directly govern federal procurement

o validity & construction of Ks to which the fed gov’t is a party is controlled by fed law

· examples:

§ Kors’ cost accounting practices

§ cost controls in negotiated procurements

§ dispute resolution procedures

o may exact compliance w/ standards or requirements different from the commercial marketplace

o sovereign not held to have waived one of its sovereign powers unless surrendered in unmistakable terms

o Courts have no authority to instruct Congress how to manage its oversight responsibility over agency procurement practices

o where the statute/reg is intended solely for the gov’t’s benefit, vendors have no right to enforce the procedure

· remedies for breach:

o Kors should consider alternative theories to the procurement statutes/regs when pursuing monetary relief against the gov’t

· K will be void where the illegality was plain or palpable on the face of applicable statutes

o K invalidation after full performance is not favored

o gov’t K term that violates/conflicts w/ a fed statute = invalid/void

o King officials (CO) lack the authority to waive statutory requirements, except as allowed by law

o case law split on whether a private party may be held to waive a statutory procurement requirement

2:5 Legislative Branch – Gov’t Accountability Office (GAO)

· controlled and directed by the U.S. Comptroller General: presidential app

amp; policies

§ creator, developer, & evaluator of uniform procurement policies

o Defense Acquisition Regulations (DAR) Council

· composed of the SecDef & each of the military dep’ts, Defense Logistics Agency, & NASA

· principle function = recommend revisions/additions to the FAR & the Defense FAR Supplement

o Civilian Agency Acquisition (CAA) Council

· chaired by a rep of the Administrator of the General Services and membership comprised of reps from the civilian agencies

· functional equal to the DAR Council for covered civilian agencies

· DAR/CAA Councils are jointly responsible for preparing & issuing revisions to the basic set of regs governing fed Ks (FAR)

Judicial Branch

Friday, January 03, 2014

2:53 PM

2:10 Judicial Branch

· principally influenced by the U.S. CoA for the Fed Circuit, U.S. Court of Fed Claims, and, to a lesser extent, by the SCOTUS

o Court of Fed Claims:

· statutory authority to decide Kor disputes w/ the gov’t

· alternatively: Kor may choose to appeal to an agency board of K appeals

· also has bid protest authority under the revised Tucker Act

o CoA for the Fed Circuit:

· appellate reviewer of decisions of the boards of K appeals & of the Court of Fed Claims

o District Courts & other CoA:

· traditionally been less directly involved in the fed Ks process

· very limited participation in considering the merits of K disputes b/c these forums have no jurisdiction where the case is covered by the statutes such as the K Disputes Act

· sig indirect impact on gov’t Ks practice b/c they, along w/state courts, decide all cases b/t prime Kors & subKors under federal Ks

o SCOTUS

· rarely agree to review gov’t K cases

· fed court decisions can directly affect the interpretation & application of rules & clauses (substantive rights & obligations frequently turn on the construction of gov’t regs & K clauses)

o specific statutes or Executive Orders affecting the gov’t Ks process may be construed by all fed courts