Antitrust – Page-Fall- 2013
Definitions
· Trust – property held by one party for the benefit of another
· Trust company – financial organization which provides trust services
o Trust services
§ Acting in capacity of trustee, fiduciary or agent for individuals and companies
Antitrust Economics
· Economic Generalizations Employed by Courts About Antitrust
o Protects consumers
o Protects competition, not competitors
o Competition trumps all other social values
o Competition enhances consumer welfare
o Agnostic about actual prices charged in market in question
o Distinction between horizontal and vertical relationships
o Monopoly is a market failure requiring correction by government intervention
· Economic Theory
o Economics
§ Theory of average human behavior
§ How to allocate scarce resources based on rational consumer actions
o Individuals make choices to maximize their own welfare
o Price Competition
§ Individual consumers have knowledge about a market, its sellers and their respective prices.
§ Consumers will always seek to buy goods at the lowest price.
§ If prices of a product increase, consumers will substitute.
§ In a competitive market, sellers will seek to increase their share of it by attracting customers through lower prices
· Raising prices will drive customers to competitors
§ In unhealthy markets, sellers raising prices will not be punished because consumers have no reasonable alternative.
o Market Self-Regulation
§ Markets should be allowed to regulate themselves
§ Market self-regulation > government regulation
§ Antitrust seeks to preserve conditions which allow markets to properly self-regulate
§ Process causes optimal resource allocation
o Ideal Competitive Market Conditions
§ No entry barriers
§ Perfect information for all buyers and sellers
§ Zero transaction costs
§ Goods are fungible with readily available substitutes
o Ideal Perfect Competition
§ Demands the lowest possible prices for products
§ Long-run equilibrium price in perfect competition = cost of production
· All producers in a perfectly competitive market will earn zero economic profit
§ Competition will push down the cost of production to as low as possible due to sellers/producers incentive to productive efficiency (to remain competitive)
§ Productive efficiency allows sellers/producers to potentially gain economic profit or to win greater market share from competitors
§ Competitive process à optimal resource allocation
o Impairments to Ideal Market Conditions
§ High entry barriers
· High start-up costs
· Regulatory barriers
o License requirements
· Control by one seller of the facilities required for effective competition
§ Informational dysfunctions
· Information costs
· Fraud
· Asymmetries
§ Imperfect Substitutes and Product Differentiation
o Competitors are HOSTILE to Free Competition
§ Drives down their profits à lower profits
§ Incentive to abuse markets in ways to raise profits
o Ideal Market and Perfect Competition are UNOBTAINABLE
§ Some sellers/producers will obtain market power which will allow one or many to set prices, rather than buyer/consumer preferences
§ Sellers prefer a price > competitive price
· Limit on this is monopoly price
o Price above monopoly price will reduce sellers’ profits
§ Dynamic efficiency gained over time can make short-run social losses due to super-competitive prices acceptable
· Economic Theory Applied
o See Packet and Supplement, p. 28
o Price consumers will pay at certain level of output
o Quantity consumers will demand a certain price
§ Producer total revenue (TR) = Qd x Pd
§ Revenue – total amount of money the seller earn from the sale of a good, before accounting for any costs
o Economic Cost of production per unit
§ Economic cost – cost of all raw materials, labor, equipment and a competitive rate of return on money invested in firm to keep it going
o
equal to 1 = elastic
§ Ed = # < 1 = inelastic
§ Elasticity depends on
· Relevant Market Definition
o Plaintiffs define market narrowly
· Time
o More time to find substitutes = greater elasticity
§ Elasticity higher at upper-sector of demand curve
· Cheaper substitutes
· High prices lead to new entrants who provide substitutes
§ In a competitive market, firm faces perfectly elastic demand
· D = MC = AR
· D not affected by its output decisions
o Monopoly
§ Monopolists see no difference between firm demand curve and market demand curve
§ Monopolists increase total revenue by decreasing output quantity, which raises prices
§ Will set profit-maximizing price to where marginal cost is = to marginal revenue
§ Don’t really need 100% market share to engage in monopoly pricing
Nature and Theory of Federal Competition Policy
· Antitrust law embodies the policy that private persons cannot take actions to improperly interfere in the functioning of a competitive market
· Generally, private interferences in the market are illegal if they’re unreasonable.
· Reasonableness Key Question
o Did some conduct challenged by a plaintiff injure a market in some way that, according to economic theory, causes a net harm to consumers?
· Antitrust law protects competition, not competitors
o Brunswick v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc. (1977)
· Court holds interbrand competition as primary antitrust concern
o Intrabrand competition might produce substantial consumer benefits
o Continental T.V. v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. (1977)