INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
SPRING 2013 – Professor Lee
I. General Topics
Course Themes
Intended objectives & unintended consequences of IP
Balancing the rights of creators w/ those of subsequent users and the public at large
i. Rich Public Domain
1. Concept
a. Culture, like science and technology, grows by accretion, each new creator building on the works of those who came before it.
b. IP rights should be considered fairly utilitarian
2. Copyright
a. Scene a Faire
b. Fair Use
3. TM
a. Generic words, concepts
b. Fair Use
4. Right to Publicity
Challenges posed by technological and social evolution.
Philosophical Rationales of IP
Natural Rights Perspective
i. John Locke – Two Treatise on Government
1. When you put labor into something you create a property right in that thing. Own bodies, own labor.
2. Pre-labor, the item is in the commons (in natural state),
3. Can take from the commons but leave “enough and as good” behind for others; can only take what you can make use of.
4. Limitation: two people work independently and create same product…who owns it? Person who patented first.
Personhood Theory (copyright)
i. Hegel, et al.
1. In creating something, your personhood becomes bound-up with that property.
2. This is most relevant to copyright, i.e. Harry Potter’s author feels connected with the book’s moral character
3. People define their personhood by their relationship to things
Utilitarian/Economic Incentive Theory
i. This is the dominant theme for IP protection
ii. Economic take on IP
1. Information is a public good
2. Public goods are (1) non-rivalrous and (2) non-excludable.
3. This is subject to free-rider problem èmust create a private property right (to a public good, i.e. info) to fix the problems of market to induce invention.
4. Ensures the integrity of marketplace transactions
II. Trade Secret
Overview/General
State law doctrines protecting against misappropriation of valuable, secret technical and business information
Source of law: Mostly CL & state law; some federal statutes, specifically the Uniform Trade Secrets Act & Restatement of Torts
Subject matter: anything of value that is secret (formulae, patterns, compilations, programs, devises)
Standard for protection: Information is secret, reasonable efforts to maintain secrecy, commercial value
Length of Protection: until becomes publicly known
Elements:
i. Subject matter must qualify for trade secret protection (a secret, valuable, required effort or expense to obtain)
ii. Reasonable precautions taken to prevent disclosure
iii. Misappropriation; The secret was wrongly acquired
Theories of Trade Secret; used to interpret the elements
Tort v. Economic (promote innovation) Theme
i. Trade Secrets can generally either be seen as a tort issue (deterrence of bad behavior, focuses on misappropriation) or an economic issue (protecting efficiency & incentive structure of industry)
ii. Uniform Trade Secrets Act (1985)
1. Trade Secret means information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process that:
a. Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use AND
b. Is the subject of reasonable efforts to maintain secrecy
Lockean è if a businessman worked & used his imagination over competitors, then he deserves to have that recognized.
Goals èdon’t want inhibit productivity if had too stringent requirement for secrecy.
Subject Matter
SECRET – absolute secrecy not required {split in definition)
i. Restatement of Torts (deterrence) – not actually known by D
1. “Secret” may encompass known information
2. Information that is knowable, but not known still qualifies as secret.
a. Metallurgical Industries case èthe process of making new furnace was not known.
3. Restatement elements of secrecy:
a. Extent to which info is known outside the claimant’s business
i. Extent it is known by employees and others involved in business
ii. Extent measures taken to guard the secrecy
iii. Value of the info to business & competitors
iv. Effort or money expended by business in developing information
v. Ease or difficulty with which the information could be properly acquired or duplicated by others.
ii. Uniform Trade Secrets Act (property rights, utilitarian) – not knowable to D
1. Only information internal to P
2. Not a secret if generally known or readily ascertainable by proper means
iii. NOTE—Objective indications: treating the info as secret, nondisclosure agreements, etc.
VALUABLE
i. Secret must be economically valuable
ii. Split in definition
1. Restatement Torts (deterrence)
a. Metallurgical Industries èif ∆’s breach to employer was particularly bad, then even if no value, can still seek redress in court
2. UTSA (economic)
a. Secret must give actual economic advantage over competitors.
b. Scientology case –Spiritual value is not enough to meet this requirement; didn’t give economic edge over competitors.
Required effort or expense
Reasonable Efforts to maintain secrecy
General
i. Reasonableness is a fact question – efforts to prevent theft or use by former employee?
ii. Must be optimum security, not perfect – subject to cost-benefit curve
Rationale
i. Evidentiary
1. Tort theory: evidence that trade secret misappropriated
a. Rockwell v. DEV ègreater the precautions, the lower the probability that DEV obtained the information properly
2. USTA: evidence the trade secret was valuable
ii. Remedial – Because there was a wrong, a remedy is necessary
Disclosure
i. Publication by owner/patent application
ii. Selling a product embodying the secret
iii. Disclosure by a party other than the owner
iv. Inadvertent disclosure
v. Required government disclosure (just compensation is due to the owner in this case under 5th Amendment)
Misappropriation
General
i. Restatement: one who discloses or uses another’s trade secret, without a privilege to do so, is liable to the other if (a) discovered by improper means or (b) disclosure is breach of confidence
Improper Means
i. USTA:
1. Improper means includes theft, bribery, misrepresentation, breach or inducement of a breach of duty to maintain secre
tage of their relationship with customers.
Remedies
UTSA: Types
i. Enjoin action, obtain royalties, protect the secret (econ) èproperty view
ii. Get actual losses from disclosure, unjust enrichment, exemplary damages (tort)
iii. Attorneys fees if all claims v. person made in bad faith, or misappropriation was willful & malicious. (tort)
Protecting the Resource
i. Property Rule èowner can exclude access & that resource is protected by injunction
1. The general rule in IP law does not make injunctions automatic, but applies a four-factor balancing test:
a. Whether P will be irreparably injured absent an injunction
b. Whether the grant of an injunction would impose more hardship
c. Whether the denial of an injunction would impose more hardship
d. Public interest concerns
ii. Liability Rule èowner cannot prevent access to a resource, but compensation to owner is mandatory.
1. Emminent Domain ègovt has power to take property requires only just compensation. If you create medicine & don’t want to manufacture it, govt. can force you to sell to them so they can manf.
Head Start injunction
i. Available to Ps who have published or otherwise disclosed their secret at some point after it was misappropriated
ii. Winston v. 3M case èordered 2-year injunction for misappropriation, but not final, b/c patent disclosure was imminent, thereafter he could use.
1. Unfair competition should be enjoined for the amount of time it would take to develop a similar product after disclosure.
Federal Trade Secret Protection
Economic Espionage Act of 1996 broadly redefines misappropriation, and protects secrets from taken w/o authorization.
III. Patents
Overview/General
Gen: federal protection for inventions and confers a strong, short right to exclude
Source of law: Constitutionally mandated to be handled federally
i. Art. I, § 8, Cl. 8: Congress shall have the power to promote the progress of science and useful arts by securing for limited times to authors and inventors exclusive rights to writings/discoveries.
1. Graham èclause is a grant of power & a limitation, can’t enlarge the patent monopoly (promote progress & useful arts), and can’t give a patent w/o regard to how innovative the thing is.
ii. Patent Code: 35 USC.
Subject matter: Processes, machines, manufacturers, improvements, plants, design
Term of protection: 20 years from the date of filing
Rationale: Progress is overarching motivation/framework; quid pro quo: disclosure for exclusive rights, almost entirely economic; doesn’t exist to reward inventor, but to incentivize invention (inventions are public goods).