Select Page

Business Associations
University of California, Davis School of Law
Joo, Thomas W.

1. Economic and Legal Aspects of Firm
a. Introduction
i. Definitions of a Business Firm
b. Agency Law
i. Default Rule
ii. Agent’s Fiduciary Duty
iii. Employment at Will
iv. Agency and Relations with Creditors
2. General Partnership and Other Noncorporate Business Associations
a. Traditional and Emerging Standard Forms
i. Sole Proprietorship
ii. General Partnership
1. Determining Whether a Partnership Existed
a. Problem 2-1
2. Sharing Profit and Loss
a. Problems 2-3
b. Problems 2-4
iii. Joint Venture
iv. Limited Partnership (LP)
v. Limited Liability Company (LLC)
vi. Limited Liability Partnership (LLP)
b. Fiduciary Duties of Partners, Duty of Loyalty
i. Problem 2-5
c. Partner’s Power to Manage the Partnership; Duty of Care
i. Problem 2-6
d. Dissociation and Dissolution
i. Problems 2-7
ii. Problems 2-8
e. Allocating Losses to Third Parties
3. Corporate Form and the Roles of Shareholders and Managers
a. Overview
i. Problem 3-2 (1)(a-d)
b. Shareholder Voting for Election of Directors
i. Problem 3-6
c. Shareholder Action after Electing Directors
i. Annual Meeting
ii. Removal
d. Governance of Publicly-Held Corporations
i. Problem 3-12
ii. How Publicly Owned Corporations are Different
iii. The Role of Federal Law for Publicly Held Corporations
1. “Socially Significant” Shareholder Proposals
2. Governance-Related Shareholder Proposals
iv. State Law: Access to Shareholder Voting Rights
4. Fiduciary Duties of Officers and Directors

1. Economic and Legal Aspects of Firm
a. Introduction
i. Definitions of a Business Firm
1. Sole Proprietorship – owned by one person
a. Do business by K – suppliers, truck driver, etc.
2. The Firm– sole proprietorship becomes a “firm” when we have an employee
a. an economic concept of a business as a unit that is separate from the market
b. Distinction between people inside the business (e.g. an employee) and people outside (e.g. K with truck driver)
i. Difference of degree:
1. Discrete K – single, self-contained, independent K (e.g. K with truck driver on random basis). No real requirement of good faith
2. Relational K– K on continual basis (e.g. agreement with truck driver to pick up every day, etc. Higher duty of good faith.)
ii. Spectrum between platonic idea of K (e.g. no relationship – make and then separate, never see each other again) and relational K.
3. A Business Association – a jointly owned firm – horizontal relationship.
a. Does not focus on who calls the shots, but instead, who owns the business.
b. When have joint ownership, then opportunism needs to be heeded to
i. “Shirking (slacking) and Sharking (stab back)”
c. Look at internal and external relations of people
i. Example: J&M co-owners – J makes deal with supplier. J breaches. M liable?
1. M’s liability to external player depends on internal arrangement.
ii. There is always someone you have to rely upon, unlike a sole practitioner.
d. Partnership – a small number of people owning a business together.
e. Corporation – Shareholders are the owners and corporation is divided into shares.
1. Not the office doing work like partner, but they are still owners.
ii. Types of capital
1. money capital(e.g. raw money available)
2. human capital(e.g. intellectual capability)
iii. Transaction Cost Factors
1. Bounded Rationality – you don’t know everything, so not all decisions are rational and calculated
2. Opportunism – possibility that someone will stab you in the back to benefit themselves so you want to control and monitor the person (e.g. Enron executives – people kept their day jobs and invested money in Enron, without knowing what Enron did)
3. Team Specific Investment – investments specific to this venture and money/assets cannot be used for something else (e.g. take job at brewery, and if business goes under, she loses her job)
a. Locking – if invest money, take job, etc., then you are stuck and cannot back out. If you lose 50% of bottling machine, then she cannot just take bottling machine home or sell it – because there is joint ownership
4. Risk Averse, Risk Neutral, Risk Preferring – will dictate what kind of investment you’ll make
b. Agency Law
i. Default rule – The Principal is the boss and the Agent is the employee. The Agent owes a Fiduciary Duty to the principal that stems from trust, as the principal has entrusted the agent with certain things.
1. Use default rule of principal-agent relationship, unless otherwise stated.
a. This is a common law principle – modern PC name for “Law of Master and Servant”
b. Can be tailored through rules of contract
2. Fiduciary duties: (1) duty of loyalty, and (2) the duty of care
a. Fiduciary duty goes 1 way – agent owes fiduciary duty to principal but principle does not owe duty to agent
i. Unlike a contractual relationship, which is a 2-way relationship
b. Look at whether employees (inside firm) or independent contractors (outside firm)
ii. Agent’s Fiduciary Duty – Agent owes his principal a fiduciary duty of loyalty.
1. Duty requires agent to act in best interest of his principal and refrain from self-interested behavior.
2. Duty substitutes for express contractual specification of exactly what an agent may or may not do.
3. It is a one-way duty; agent owes it to principal, but principal does not owe to agent.
4. Community Counseling Services v. Reilly – Riley was sales rep for CCS. CCS runs fundraisers for Catholic parishes. Riley quits, engages in similar clients (solicited clients while still employee of CCS). Riley argues that there is no K term saying he can’t do this. CCS sues. Court holds that Riley violated duty. An agent owes fiduciary duties to the principal.
a. If he had quit, this would be ok. But part of his duty as agent is not to engage in such behavior as to work against CCS, even though there is no agreement between them.
b. If you’re an independent contractor, then you’re not an agent (employee) so you can do this. However, Riley was agent because he had contract and ageny relationship.
5. Hamburger v. Hamburger – Began lining up new business while employed, then quit job and solicited clients after he left. Argued that he took company lists of customers after he left. Hamburger’s behavior

man & Renshaw – Business held vicariously liable for fraudulent misrepresentations of former associate and son of partner of business. Business contended that actions of former associate could not be imputed to them, because appellant had no knowledge of deception. Jordan Rothbart conned Sennott to buy fake securities. Business wins because it did not have ostensible authority. No evidence of knowledge or apparent authority.
i. ***Prof Joo: Sennott partially responsible – he knew it was shady, and even covered for Rothbart when Rodman & Renshaw tried to figure out what was going on.

2. General Partnership and Other Noncorporate Business Associations
a. Traditional and Emerging Standard Forms
i. Two main issues: (1) ownership (who takes losses?), and (2) control (who makes decisions?)
ii. Sole-Proprietorship (review)
1. This is the default if one person is the owner. Most basic kind of organization you can have is a single person running the business by himself. If things go wrong or right, then you alone are responsible.
2. The business “entity” cannot continue beyond life of owner.
3. Management is centralized, and owner is free to transfer his interest at will.
4. Ideal if a person wants to set up a business with only one owner, desires little formality, is willing to risk personal assets, and wants to avoid double taxation.
iii. General Partnership
1. UPA – defines partnership as “an association of two or more persons to carry on as co-owners a business for profit.” General partnership can come into existence by operation of law (without need to file any formal papers with state official). Each partner is liable for all debts of partnership.
2. Three default rules (internal issues):
a. (1) profits / losses / control split equally
b. (2) Withdrawal at will (if 1 partnership withdraws, partnership is over)
c. (3) Fiduciary duty owed among and between partners
3. Assume something is a partnership (i.e., no formal agreement needed), IF:
a. (1) intent to run business for profit
b. (2) as co-owners (subject to change by K)
i. Share profits and losses, AND
ii. Right to control
4. External Relationships
a. Partners personally liable for obligations of the partnership
b. Management generally not centralized, but rather is spread among partners
c. Ownership interests of partners cannot be transferred without the consent of the other partners
d. Partnership generally does not continue beyond the lives of its owners (although can let other partners take over)