Crim Law Outline
Warnken_CrimLaw_Summer_2013
Class #1: Criminal Law Classification, Sources of Criminal Law, & Interpretation of Criminal Law
I. Classification of crimes
a. Common law (CL) offenses
i. Felonies
1. Murder / rape / manslaughter / robbery / sodomy / larceny / arson, mayhem / burglary (MR & MRS LAMB)
2. Some jurisdictions felonies punishable by death / incarceration
a. (a) particular institutions
i. Prison vs County jai
b. (b) particular period
i. Excess of 1 year
ii. misdemeanors
1. Anything not a felony
iii. Md offenses
1. CL Felonies unless abrogated/changed to misdemeanor
2. Statutory crimes = misdemeanors unless legislator declares a felony
b. Felony-misdemeanor Distinctions
i. Subject matter jurisdiction
1. District Court (DC)
a. exclusive jurisdiction over most misdemeanors
2. Circuit Courts (CC)
a. exclusive jurisdiction over most felonies
ii. Statute of limitations (S/L)
1. no S/L at CL
2. Md
a. No S/L for felonies / misdemeanors with Division of Correction (DOC) penalty
b. Most misdemeanors with no statutory DOC penalty have1-year S/L
iii. Accomplice liability
1. Felonies at CL
a. Principals in 1st degree, 2nd degree
b. Accessories before the fact, after the fact;
2. Distinctions mostly eliminated
a. Treason
i. All parties principals
b. Misdemeanors at CL
i. All parties are principals except accessories after the fact have no liability
iv. Effect on applicability of defenses
1. Defense of property requirement = inherently dangerous felony to permit deadly force
v. Sentencing consequences
1. For property crimes / felony / misdemeanor usually based on value
a. Md,
i. Theft = $1,000
ii. Bad check = $500
2. Enhancement / recidivist / mandatory sentencing = current sentence may be enhanced / mandatory based on
i. Prior felony
ii. Misdemeanor = felony based on prior conviction
vi. Procedure consequences
1. 6th A right to counsel
a. applies to all felonies
b. misdemeanors with potential incarceration;
2. 5th A grand jury indictment for federal felonies
a. Not apply to federal misdemeanors or states
b. Md NOT require grand jury indictment for felonies or misdemeanors
vii. Evidentiary consequences
1. Some states permit impeachment by felony convictions & not by misdemeanor convictions
viii. Collateral consequences
1. Some states permit employment to be denied / suspended / terminated based on felony conviction BUT NOT misdemeanor
2. Licensing procedures may be influenced more negatively by felony than by misdemeanor
a. e.g., registering handgun / practicing law or medicine,
3. K Rights may be limited by felony but not misdemeanor
a. e.g., insurance policy denying coverage if insured dies while committing a felony;
4. Right to K may be limited by a felony conviction,
a. e.g., government contractors
5. Right to vote / run for public office may be denied to convicted felons but not misdemeanants
c. Mala in se classification vs. mala prohibita classification
i. Mala in se
1. inherently wrong,
a. e.g., CL offenses
ii. Mala prohibita
1. wrong solely b/c legislature made it a crime
d. Categories of offenses
i. Inchoate/preparatory crimes
1. Attempt
2. Solicitation
3. conspiracy
ii. Crimes against property
1. Larceny
2. Embezzlement
3. false pretenses
4. receiving stolen goods
5. theft
6. bad check
7. forgery
8. uttering
9. misappropriation by fiduciary
iii. Crimes against habitation
1. Burglary
2. arson
iv. Crimes against persons
1. Assault
2. Battery
3. reckless endangerment
4. robbery
5. carjacking
6. false imprisonment
7. kidnapping
8. child abuse
9. abuse of a vulnerable adult
v. Weapons offenses
1. prohibit possession
2. use, or transport of dangerous weapons
3. firearms, or handguns
4. aggravate offenses when committed with dangerous weapons, firearms, or handguns
vi. Sex offenses
1. Rape
2. sex offense by sexual act or contact
3. sodomy
4. unnatural or perverted sexual practices
5. child sexual abuse
6. incest
vii. Homicide offenses
1. prohibit killing persons,
a. e.g., murder, manslaughter, or terminating viable fetus
II. Sources of criminal law
a. Primary authority
i. Case law
1. Courts
ii. Constitutions
1. Constitutions (Fed / State)
iii. Enacted law
1. Legislation
iv. Executive branch
1. in “quasi-legislative” function, promulgates administrative regulations
v. Courts
1. Court rules
vi. Treaties
1. International statutes that are K’s between nations
b. Federal & Md criminal law
i. No federal CL & only statutory (except in D.C.)\
ii. Assimilative Crimes Act (ACA)
1. Fed enclaves in states, e.g., military installations, federal buildings, national parks & forests, if “gap” in fed law, under ACA, fed law adopts state crim law of state where fed enclave is
iii. Md CL & statutes
1. CL may be abrogated / amended via
a. Constitution
b. state statute
c. judicial abrogation
III. Interpretation of criminal law
a. English 1776 CL
i. Md Decl of Rights adopted, as of July 4, 1776, all English case law / most English statutes
ii. Legislature silent
1. Ct of Appeals may create, abrogate, or amend CL
iii. Legislature has made law,
1. Separation of powers = Ct’s can’t make law, only interpret it
b. Stare decisis
i. “like cases decided in like manner”
c. Supreme Court of the U.S.
i. Hears cases en banc
ii. Binds all other courts (with published opinions)
d. U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit
i. Cases heard 3-judge panels
ii. Binds U.S. Dist Ct for MD (with binding published opinions in 15% of its cases)
e. Court of Appeals of Md (Highest Court)
i. Hears cases en banc
ii. Binds Ct of Special Appeals, Md CC, & Md DC (with published opinions)
f. Court of Special Appeals of Md (Intermediate Court)
i. Cases before 3-judge panels
ii. Binds Md CC & DC (with binding published opinions in 20% of its cases)
g. Binding courts
i. Binding court has published opinion – court must
1. Apply
2. Distinguish
3. Overrule its prior cases
ii. Lower cts must
1. apply
2. distinguish binding court’s prior cases
iii. Trial courts do not bind other courts
h. Mandatory case law
i. limited to
1. (a) holding / rationale (not dicta unnecessary to court’s opinion),
2. (b) cases not distinguishable to applicable law (same law or law sufficiently similar law)
3. (c) cases not distinguishable as to facts (legally significant facts are analogous)
ii. P
together if addressing same subject matter
iv. Special statutes control over general statutes
1. 2 statutes conflict
a. special statute control over general statute
v. Later statutes control over earlier statutes
1. 2 statutes conflict
a. later statute controls over earlier statute
vi. Reconciling conflicts among rules of reconciliation
1. “special over general” & “later over earlier” conflict
a. “earlier-special” controls over “later-general”
vii. Repeal of a repealing statute
1. Repeal usually revives previously repealed statute
viii. Comparison
1. Compare statutes
a. Compare statute and court rule with same or similar law / rule in other jurisdictions or at CL
i. Identical/ substantially similar as judicial glosse
1. “borrowed statutes doctrine” assumes that the borrowing state borrowed the judicial gloss
2. Compare previous versions
a. Amendment / revision / re-enactment w/o relevant change likely means approval of earlier version as interpreted
b. if striking change of expression in the current version =
i. (a) change in legislative intent
ii. (b) attempt to make intent clear
iii. (c) legislative response to judicial gloss on earlier version, considering extent of change / placement of the change / timing of change of expression
3. Compare earlier bills
a. consider evolution from original bill to enactment
b. compare drafts / amendments
c. striking changes of expression = shows legislative intent
4. Compare with CL / terms of art as judicially evolved
a. more closely statute / court rule parallels CL words or terms of art = more likely legislature intended to adopt the CL meaning
5. Ejusdem generis
a. specific list followed by general term =
i. list is not closed
ii. includes other items of same kind as items on list
6. Expressio unius, exclusio alterius
a. specific list not followed by a general term =
i. list is closed
ii. expression of one (or some) means exclusion of others
ix. Characterization of an item vs. limitation to that item
1. Mandatory vs. directory language
a. mandatory language
i. includes “shall,” “must,” or negative language,
ii. provides sanction for non-compliance
iii. statute may be mandatory even w/o sanction for non-compliance
1. “should,” “may,” or no sanction usually means directory
2. Disjunctive vs. conjunctive language
a. disjunctive language (“or”)
i. means any one is sufficient
b. conjunctive language (“and”)
i. means need all items
3. Singular vs. plural language
a. singular means plural & plural means singular
x. Gender
1. reference to one gender includes reference to the other
xi. Verb tense
1. present tense words include future tense