Select Page

Civil Procedure II
University of Akron School of Law
Anderson, Lloyd C.

Anderson
Civpro
Spring 2011
 
 
A. Substitutionary Remedies (monetary)
•         Compensatory—put client back to where they were
•         Punitive—Purpose is to PUNISH the D for “bad” conduct and to defer the D and others in engaging in such conduct
•         Hard to get, usually have to prove intent and breach of duty/amts. are usu. low but have increased over the years
•         As amts. get higher, cases go to SC for Due Process (14th Amendment forbids “depriving any person of life, liberty, or property w/o due process of law)—SC can overturn awards that they feel are excessive
•         Court has insisted that punitive awards be proportional to the harm inflicted, focusing on 
•         the degree of reprehensibility of the D’s misconduct
•         the disparity b/w the actual or potential harm suffered by the P and the punitive damages award
•         the difference b/w the punitive damages awarded by the jury and the civil penalties authorized or imposed in comparable cases
 
B. Analyzing the above Guideposts for Punitive Damages (State Farm v. Campbell)
•         Degree of Reprehensibility
•         physical vs. economic harm/indifference vs. reckless/repeated vs. isolated
•         Disparity b/w punitive and compensatory damages
•         Single digit multiplier
•         Court established a presumption that if ratio is more than 9:1, the award probably violates Due Process
•         Disparity b/w civil penalties in comparable cases and punitive damages sought
•         In State Farm, most relevant civil sanction was $10,000CONSIDERABLY less than the award sought
 
C. Specific Remedies
•         Injunctions
•         Declaratory Judgments
 
D.  Injunctions
•         RULE:  The determination whether to issue an injunction involves a balancing of the interests of the parties who might be affected by the Court’s decision—the hardship on P if relief is denied as opposed to the hardship to D if it is granted.   (Sigma v. Harris)
•         The main prerequisite to obtaining injunctive relief (an equitable remedy) is that there is no suitable remedy at law
•         Not the case in Sigma v. Harris, but exceptions can be made if in practice, the remedy at law is not adequate
E.  Declaratory Relief
•         A remedy that simply asks the court to declare what the parties’ rights and obligations are, but does not actually order them to do anything
•         May be chosen even though other avenues are open to the parties
•         Two problems:
•         Fine line b/w hypothetical case and a concrete factual controversy
•         Jurisdictional problems
 
F.  Financing Litigation/Attorney’s Fees
•         American Rule (Each client pays his own lawyer)
•         Could be per hour
•         Flat rate
•         Legal insurance
•         Contingent (percentage of recovery)
•         English rule (Loser pays winner’s lawyer)
•         Contract—parties can agree when entering into a contract that the losing sign will pay all legal expenses
•         Common law—common fund doctrine (if litigation results in creation of a fund that could benefit others beside P, lawyer gets paid out of the fund; important in class actions)
•         Fee-shifting statute—in certain kinds of cases, court can award prevailing party reasonable attorney fees
•         Society

that may occur to the P is sufficiently serious, it is only necessary that there be a fair chance of success on the merits.
 
 
•         Temporary Restraining Orders (TROs)—faster than preliminary inunctions, don’t need notice; 10 day limit (and then one 10 day extension)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
•         Provisional Remedies and Due Process: Prejudgment seizure of property
1. RULE: To be consistent w/ Due Process, a hearing is required b/f the 
   seizure of property to prevent unfair and mistaken deprivations of  
   property (Fuentes v. Shevlin p. 322)
             2.
•         Promotes fairness
•         Does not discourage ownership of property
               3.EXTRAORDINARY CASES (where prior notice can be dispensed with and
                  still comport with due process):
•         The seizure has been directly necessary to secure an important governmental or general public interest
•         e.g. Domestic violence:  protects public interest b/c by giving abuser notice, he may act violently, and other women will be discouraged from filing such orders
•         There has been a special need for very prompt action
•         Domestic violence (obvious)
•         The State has kept strict control over its monopoly of legitimate force
•         e.g. IRS seizures