·Criminal Law Outline – Michael Boucai
Spring 2016
I. Introduction
A. The Criminal Process
B. Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt
i. Owens v. State
II. Punishment
A. General
i. Kansas v. Hendricks (1997)
B. Approaches to Punishment
i. Halden Prison vs. Pelican Bay Prison
ii. Utilitarianism
a. General Deterrence
b. Specific Deterrence
c. Incapacitation
d. Rehabilitation
e. Punishing the Innocent?
iii. Retributivism
a. Positive v. Negative
b. Stephen: Hatred and Vengeance?
c. Morris: Punishment as Right
d. Hampton: Punishment as Right
C. Atkinson Case
D. MPC §§ 1.02(1), (2)
E. People v. Du
F. Proportionality
i. Kant
ii. Bentham
iii. The Eighth Amendment
a. Coker v. Georgia
b. Ewing v. California
III. Enforcement of Morals
A. Two Great Debates
i. John Stuart Mill v. James Fitzjames Stephen
ii. HLA Hart v. Patrick Lord Devlin
B. Lawrence v. Texas and the Constitutionality of Morals Legislation
IV. Jury Nullification
A. Criminal Juries: The Sixth Amendment
B. State v. Ragland
C. Prevalence
D. Dismissal of Potential “Nullifiers”
E. Finality of Acquittals
V. Legality and Statutory Interpretation
A. Basic Rules
B. Applications
i. Prospectivity and Legislation
a. Commonwealth v. Mochan
b. Keeler v. Superior Court
ii. Clarity
a. In re Banks
b. Chicago v. Morales
iii. Lenity; Statutory Construction
a. Muscarello v. United States
b. Methods of Statutory Construction
VI. Actus Reus
A. Standard Elements
B. Conduct Crimes and Result Crimes
C. Attendant Circumstances
D. Voluntariness
i. Martin v. State
ii. People v. Decina [Epileptic Driver]
iii. State v. Utter
E. Omissions
i. People v. Beardsley
ii. When might be an omission be criminal?
iii. Barber v. Superior Court
VII. Mens Rea
A. Mens rea as culpability vs. “elemental” mens rea
i. Regina v. Cunningham
B. MPC § 2.02
i. § 2.02(2)(a): Puposely
ii. § 2.02(4): Prescribed Culpability Requirement Applies to All Material
Elements
iii. § 2.02(2)(b): Knowingly
iv. § 2.03(3): Culpability Required Unless Otherwise Provided
v. § 2.02(2)(c): Recklessly
vi. § 2.02(2)(d): Negligently
vii. § 2.02(5): Lesser includes greater
C. People v. Conley
i. Application of mens rea to result element
ii. Presumption of intent
iii. Transferred intent
a. MPC § 2.03(2)
D. General v. Specific Intent
E. Willful Blindness
i. State v. Nations
VIII. Strict Liability
A. General
B. Staples v. United States
C. MPC § 2.02(3)
D. MPC § 2.05(2)
E. Garnett v. State
IX. Mistake of Fact
A. MPC § 2.04(1)
B. MPC § 2.04(2)
C. Common-Law Mistake-of-Fact Analysis
i. People v. Navarro
ii. Moral Wrong Doctrine
a. Regina v. Prince
X. Mistake of Law
A. General Rule
B. Exceptions
i. People v. Marerro
ii. Cheek v. United States
iii. Lambert v. California
XI. Causation
A. Actual Cause / Cause in Fact
i. Oxendine v. State
ii. MPC § 203(1)
iii. Substantial factor test
B. Legal / Proximate Cause
i. People v. Rideout
ii. Common law proximate cause factors / doctrines
a. Foreseeability: responsive v. coincidental
b. Apparent safety
c. Voluntary intervention
d. De minimis causation
e. Intended consequences
f. Omissions
iii. Velasquez v. State
iv. MPC §§ 2.03(2)(b) & 2.03(3)(b)
XII. Homicide
A. Overview
i. Common law approach
ii. Statutory approaches (NY)
iii. MPC approach
B. People v. Eulo: “Death of a Human Being”
C. Intentional Killings
i. “Deliberate and premeditated”
a. State v. Guthrie
b. Midgett v. State
c. State v. Forrest
ii. Voluntary Manslaughter / “Heat of Passion” Killings
a. Girouard v. State
i. Requirements of the common-law rule of provocation
ii. Common-law categories of adequate provocation
b. The reasonable/ordinary person
i. Girouard & Maher v. People (pg. 269)
ii. Director of Public Prosecutions v. Camplin
iii. Commonwealth v. Carr (281-2)
c. MPC § 219.3(1)(b)
i. People v. Casassa
D. Unintentional Killings
i. Depraved Heart Murder
a. People v. Moore
b. People v. Knoller
c. MPC § 210.2(1)(b)
ii. Involuntary Manslaughter
a. Contemporary standard: gross negligence or worse
i. MPC § 210.3(b) (reckless man
PC § 2.08(1) & (2)
b. Failure of proof: actus reus
i. MPC § 2.01
c. Affirmative defense: temporary (vs fixed) insanity
i. MPC § 2.08(4)
f. Involuntary intoxication
iii. Insanity
a. Competence to stand trial
b. Penological rationales for the defense
c. Tests
i. M’Naghten
ii. Irresistible impulse
iii. Product/Durham
iv. MPC § 4.08
d. Calls for Abolition
XV. Inchoate Offenses
A. Justifications for criminalizing Inchoate Offenses
B. Attempt
i. Complete v. incomplete
ii. Merger rule
iii. Grading of attempts: common-law and MPC § 5.05
iv. Mens rea
a. People v. Gentry
b. MPC § 5.01(1)
c. Bruce v. State
d. Statutory rape and attendant circumstances
v. Actus reus
a. Preparation v. perpetration
b. Common-law tests
i. Last act
ii. Physical proximity
iii. Dangerous proximity
iv. Probable desistance
v. Unequivocality / res ipsa loquitur
c. “Substantial step” test
i. MPC §§ 5.01(1) & (2)
ii. State v. Reeves
vi. Defense: impossibility
a. People v. Thousand
b. Factual, legal, and “hybrid”
c. Inherent impossibility
vii. Defense: abandonment
a. Commonwealth v. McCloskey
b. “Complete” and “voluntary”
c. Failure-of-proof or affirmative defense?
d. MPC § 5.01(4)