Select Page

Insurance Law
Quinnipiac University School of Law
Gilles, Stephen G.

Insurance Law Outline

Contract Law Foundations

Need for Insuranceà Basic overview

Insurance company best at bearing the risk
Most people are risk averse

Willing to pay insurance company to take risk away

Difference btw risk shifting and risk spreading
Moral Hazard

Insured that doesn’t worry about things because they know the insurance company will take care of it
Insurance companies reduce moral hazard:

Exclusions in policies
Give money back for careful insured

Insurance Regulation

Two types of regulations

Regulation of insurance companies by state

Structure
How much capital and operating reserves
State regulation through state agencies/insurance commissioner
Some areas of federal regulation

EE health benefits

Chapter 2 Insurance Contract Interpretation

Ambiguity

Black Letter Rule: Contra prefentum

Interpret ambiguous insurance policies in favor of policy holders

Construe ambiguities against the drafter

Three prong test

Is policy term plain
Is policy term conspicuously displayed
Is policy term conscionable
*If no to any of three apply test

Gaunt v. John Hancock Mutual Life

Insurance company interpreting that person had to be alive at time of approval
Insured arguing that insured at time medically cleared
Handà assuming insured will read the K before signing it

Insurance company must write the K so a lay person could clearly understand that insured must be alive at time of approval

Clarkà Should be a fairness test

C&J Fertilizer, INC. v. Allied Mutual Insurance

Policy defines burglary with need of force of violence with visible marks to the exterior
Exterior door had no mark…visible marks on interior
Is definition of burglary ambiguous?

Court

Reasonable expectations doctrine

Look at what customer discussed with the agent

World Trade Center v. Travelers Indemnity

Unless the K is ambiguous follow the plain meaning ruleà no extrinsic evidence
Is “occurrence” ambiguous

Court said yes and allowed extrinsic evidence
Court did not find clear definition of occurrence in case law

Waiver and Estoppel

Waiver

Occurs where a party voluntarily and unilaterally relinquishes a known legal right.
A party can only waive a contract right that would benefit him or her.
Waiver may be either express or implied, and the party waiving the right must

1. be aware of the right that is being waived AND
2. intend to forgo the right

Estoppel

Occurs when one party’s acts or representations reasonably induce detrimental reliance on the part of another.
Unlike waiver, Estoppel depends on the conduct of both the insurer and the policyholder.

The insurer must make a representation or take an action, and the policyholder must reasonably and detrimentally rely on that representation.

Equitable Estoppel

Conduct by which one:

Induces another to believe in certain material facts
Which inducement results in acts in reliance theron, justifiably taken
Which causes injury

The Role of Insurance Intermediaries

Agent v. Broker

Agentà works on behalf of the insurer
Brokerà Works on behalf of person seeking insurance

Broker does not work for one company

Bad faith by first party insurance

Where insured is the claimant (suffers a loss)

I have damage to my car and I bring an action against my insurance company

Third Party

Insurance company must defend insured and indemnify insured up to the policy limits

Insurance company misconduct and/or failure to protect the insured, can support bad faith claims in first or third party context
Anderson v. Continental

What does insured have to show for tort of bad faith?

Must show absence of reasonable basis for denying benefits of the policy
And the defendant needs to know that there is no reason for denying coverage

Punitive Damages

Campbell v. State Farm (Third party bad faith)

State farm provided defense but not willing to settle
Courts reviewing punitive damages must consider

The degree of reprehensibility of the defendants misconduct
The disparity btw the actual or potential harm suffered by the plaintiff and the punitive damages award, AND
The difference btw the punitive damages awarded by the jury and the civil penalties authorized or imposed in comparable cases

Evidence not allowed in punitive cases