I. Chapter 1: Introduction
A. Introduction
concerned with the principles and rules governing the form and type of relief
B. Types of Remedies
1. Function of Remedies
a. Damages
(1) Compensatory Damages
o award of $ to compensate for loss or injury
o substitutionary – money for harm
o tort cases: make the plaintiff whole
o contract cases: compensate for loss & protect the plaintiff’s expectation interest (what the plaintiff would have received if the contract had been performed)
(2) Nominal Damages
o where plaintiff’s right has been violated, but no loss is sustained or the extent of the injury cannot be measured
(3) Punitive Damages
o punish the defendant for willful, wanton, or malicious conduct and to deter others
b. Restitution
§ restores to the plaintiff any benefit the wrongdoer may have gained from the misconduct
§ disgorge any unjust gain or enrichment
(1) Substitutionary Remedies
o provide the plaintiff with a monetary recovery measured by the unjust gin, rather than with the precise thing wrongfully obtained by the defendant
(2) Specific Remedies in restitution
o recovery of the precise thing wrongfully obtained by the defendant
c. Specific relief
§ gives to the injured party the precise performance promised rather than its equivalent in money
d. Preventive relief
§ protection of the plaintiff’s rights by a decree prohibiting the defendant from doing certain acts or engaging in particular activities infringing on the plaintiff’s interests
e. Declaratory relief
§ conclusively determines the rights of parties involved in a contested issue
§ settles the controversy without awarding any additional relief
2. Historical Origins of Remedies
a. Legal Remedies
§ largely substitutionary and result in judgments for $ to compensate
b. Equitable Remedies
§ generally specific and impose personal obligations or duties on the defendant
§ decree is ordinarily enforced by coercing appropriate conduct from the defendant
c. Limitation
§ choice of remedies is subject to basic limitation that equitable remedies are appropriate only where legal remedies are not adequate or are non-existent
3. Imprecise Classification – Consequences
a. Interpretation of statutes
§ damages – an award of $ recoverable in an action at law
b. Interpretation of insurance contract – environmental litigation
§ Polluters who have been ordered to remedy, prevent, or remove hazardous waste sites have looked to their insurance carriers for indemnification for these expenses
§ Insurers assert that they are required by contract to indemnify for only legal damagers – that costs incurred un obeying clean up orders are equitable and restitutionary
§ Decisions divided on issue of whether the policy language provide coverage to the polluters
o Majority – it does
o Minority – no coverage, leaving polluters to pay the costs if they can afford them
II. Chapter 2: Damages
A. Tort v. Contract Damages
1. In General
establish standards for measuring the monetary award
2. Torts Damages
damages to place the injured party in substantially as good a position as she occupied prior to the wrong
3. Contract Damages
damages to place the injured party in substantially as good a position as she would have been had the contract been performed
protects the plaintiff’s protected interest by awarding profits that might have been realized from full performance of the contract
a. Distinguish – reliance damages
where profits are difficult to prove, injured party may recover expenditures made in reliance on the contract
will be offset by any loss that the defendant can prove plaintiff would have suffered had the contract been fully performed
4. Consequential Damages Limitation in Contract Cases –
ry or comparative negligence
C. Other Damages Issues
1. Agreed (or Liquidated) Damages
contract provisions providing for payment of a specified sum of money in the event of breach will be upheld if the sum bears a reasonable relationship to the anticipated loss
2. Maximizing the Award
a. Punitive Damages
permit the imposition of punitive damages in tort actions if the defendant is guilty of willful and malicious conduct
(1) Test for excessive punitive damages
reprehensibility of the conduct; ratio of the award to actual compensatory damages assessed; difference between this award and statutory sanctions imposed for comparable compensable criminal misconduct
(2) Contracts cases
no punitive awards
(3) Other damages must be proved
(4) No fixed standard of measure – reasonable relationship
(5) Insurance
(6) Multiple plaintiff cases
b. Prejudgment interest
c. Counsel fees
in the absence of statutory authorization or an enforceable contract, attorneys’ fees are generally not recoverable
(1) Exceptions – common fund
3. ‘Collateral Sources’ Rule – No Mitigation
a. Statutory changes – some statutes abrogate the above rule
4. Credit for Benefit Rule
where defendant’s tortious conduct both harms and directly benefits the plaintiff, the value of the benefit may result in mitigation of damages
5. Computing the Award – Present Value of Future Losses
lump sum is deemed to cover all losses
6. Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith an Fair Dealing as a Tort