Select Page

Advanced Federal Income Tax
Charleston School of Law
Gutting, Kristin Balding

 
Advanced Federal Income Taxation Gutting Spring 2015
 
 
Like Kind Exchanges
–          look individually for qualification for a like kind exchange (both parties do not have to qualify for one of them to take it)
–          These exchanges fit into §61(a)(3)
o   get Gain/Loss realized
o   §1001(c) – is it recognized?
o   §1031 (like kind exchanges section) is another reason not to recognize gain/loss, which is a deferral provision
§1031 – four aspects must be met
1.      exchange requirement (NOT a sale)
2.      Like Kind requirement
a.       §1.1031a-1(b)
b.      §1.1031a-1(c)
c.       Rev. Rul. 73-476
3.      Holding Requirement
a.       property giving up – use = trade/business or investment
b.      property received – intent = trade/business or investment
4.      Solely
a.       is there boot?
                                                              i.      if yes: §1031(b) and §1031(c) come into play; (b) controls gain, (c) controls loss
1.      §1031(c) – boot does not allow loss to be recognized (treated just as §1031(a))
2.      §1031(b) – must recognize the lesser of (1) boot amount or (2) gain realized
                                                            ii.      so, what is boot?
1.      cash received
2.      non like kind property(FMV)
3.      liability relieved of (§1.1031(b)-1(c)/§1031(d))
If non like kind property is given by taxpayer:
–          §1.1031(a)-(a)(2): Sale/Exchange analysis needed outside scope of §1031 analysis
–          the only way to have loss in a §1031 transaction is to give boot that is non like kind which is depreciated (has a built in loss)
Liability Relief Rules
–          Net Rule (§1.1031(b)-1(c))
o   Net liability relief
o   only one party can have liability relief for boot purposes
 
–          Offset Rule
o   (a) giving cash or non like kind property cannot be offset by assuming liability (i.e. if a taxpayer receives money or non like kind property, taxpayer cannot offset it by assuming liability of other party)
o   (b) cash/non like kind property can be off

roblem Set-up:
–          Gain/Loss
o   A/R – A/B = G/R [§61(a)(3)] o   §1001(c) – recognize unless reason not to
o   §1031(a) – reason not to
§  Exchange [here,…] §  Like kind property [here,…] §  holding (t/b or inv)
·         gave up (how it was held)
·         rcvd (intent on how to hold it)
§  solely (is there boot?)
·         $ rcvd
·         assumption of liability
o   net
o   offset
·         non like kind property
–          New Basis? §1031(d)
o   A/B property given up (all property)
o   MINUS $ taxpayer received
o   MINUS liability taxpayer relieved of
o   ADD liability taxpayer assumed
o   MINUS loss recognized
o   EQUALS New adjusted basis
–          Holding Period?
o   tack per §1223(1)
o   §1031 trumps §267 (if property is held for two years) [in related party transactional]